100% Original Wholesale GPU Server AMD EPYC 9634 EPYC 9554 EPYC 9474F Server CPU Processor
Here’s a detailed comparison table for the AMD EPYC 9634, EPYC 9554, and EPYC 9474F (Genoa series) processors:
Specification | EPYC 9634 | EPYC 9554 | EPYC 9474F |
---|---|---|---|
Cores / Threads | 84 / 168 | 64 / 128 | 48 / 96 |
Base Clock (GHz) | 2.25 | 3.10 | 3.60 |
Max Boost (GHz) | 3.70 | 3.75 | 4.10 |
L3 Cache (MB) | 384 | 256 | 256 |
Default TDP (Watts) | 290W | 360W | 360W |
PCIe 5.0 Lanes | 128 | 128 | 128 |
Memory Support | 12-channel DDR5-4800 | 12-channel DDR5-4800 | 12-channel DDR5-4800 |
Socket | SP5 | SP5 | SP5 |
Process Node | 5nm (TSMC) | 5nm (TSMC) | 5nm (TSMC) |
Launch Date | Q4 2022 | Q4 2022 | Q4 2022 |
Target Market | Cloud/HPC Density | Balanced Performance | High Frequency |
1. AMD EPYC 9634 – The Ultimate Core Density Champion
- Best for:Â Hyperscale cloud providers, HPC workloads, and virtualized environments demanding maximum core density
- Key Advantages:
- 84 cores/168 threads – Highest core count in this comparison
- 384MB L3 cache – Largest shared cache for data-intensive applications
- 2.25GHz base/3.7GHz boost – Optimized for throughput over raw clock speed
- 290W TDP – Surprisingly efficient for its core count
- 12-channel DDR5-4800 – Unmatched memory bandwidth
- Ideal Workloads:
- Cloud-native applications at scale
- High-density virtualization (VMware, Hyper-V)
- Scientific computing and simulations
- Big data analytics and AI training
2. AMD EPYC 9554 – The Balanced Powerhouse
- Best for:Â Enterprise data centers needing optimal balance between core count and clock speed
- Standout Features:
- 64 cores/128 threads – Same core count as previous-gen flagships but with better IPC
- 3.1GHz base/3.75GHz boost – 38% higher base clock than 9634
- 360W TDP – Higher power envelope for sustained performance
- 256MB L3 cache – Still massive for most enterprise workloads
- Perfect Use Cases:
- Enterprise database servers (SQL, NoSQL)
- Mid-range HPC clusters
- Video rendering and media production
- ERP and large-scale business applications
3. AMD EPYC 9474F – The Frequency-Optimized Performer
- Best for:Â Latency-sensitive applications requiring maximum single-thread performance
- Performance Highlights:
- 48 cores/96 threads – Fewer cores but higher clocks
- 3.6GHz base/4.1GHz boost – Fastest clocks in this comparison
- 360W TDP – All power budget focused on frequency
- 256MB L3 cache – Same as 9554 despite fewer cores
- Target Applications:
- Financial modeling and risk analysis
- High-frequency trading systems
- Real-time databases (Redis, Memcached)
- Game server hosting and matchmaking
Comparative Decision Guide
Consideration | Choose EPYC 9634 if… | Choose EPYC 9554 if… | Choose EPYC 9474F if… |
---|---|---|---|
Workload Type | Need maximum parallel throughput | Want balanced performance | Require lowest latency |
Clock Sensitivity | Can tolerate lower base clocks | Need good all-core performance | Demand maximum single-thread speed |
Power Constraints | Prefer better perf/watt | Have robust cooling solutions | Will trade power for frequency |
Budget | Will pay premium for core density | Want best overall value | Need frequency over core count |
Technical Evolution from Previous Gen
- All three models feature:
- Zen 4 architecture with ~14% IPC improvement
- PCIe 5.0Â (doubling bandwidth vs. PCIe 4.0)
- DDR5 memory with 50% more bandwidth than DDR4
- Advanced security with SEV-SNP protection
Final Recommendations
- Cloud Providers:Â 9634 for maximum VM density
- Enterprise IT:Â 9554 for general-purpose workloads
- Financial Services:Â 9474F for low-latency processing
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.