100% Original Wholesale Brand new FE 400MM F2.8GM OSS FE 600MM F4 GM OSS Camera Lens
Here’s a detailed comparison table for the Sony FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS and FE 600mm f/4 GM OSS super-telephoto lenses:
| Feature | Sony FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS | Sony FE 600mm f/4 GM OSS |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 400mm | 600mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Lens Construction | 17 elements in 13 groups | 18 elements in 14 groups |
| Special Elements | 3 XA, 1 Super ED elements | 3 XA, 1 Super ED, 1 ED elements |
| Weight | 2,895g (6.38 lbs) | 3,040g (6.70 lbs) |
| Length | 358mm (14.1″) | 449mm (17.68″) |
| Filter Thread | 40.5mm drop-in | 40.5mm drop-in |
| Minimum Focus | 2.7m (8.86′) | 4.5m (14.76′) |
| Magnification | 0.16x | 0.14x |
| Image Stabilization | Yes (Mode 1/2/3) | Yes (Mode 1/2/3) |
| Autofocus | Dual XD Linear Motors | Dual XD Linear Motors |
| Tripod Collar | Removable, Arca-Swiss compatible | Removable, Arca-Swiss compatible |
| Hood Included | Yes (cylindrical) | Yes (petal-style) |
| Best For | Sports, wildlife in low light | Distant wildlife, birding |
| Price | $12,000 | $13,000 |
Sony’s flagship super-telephoto lenses—the FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS and FE 600mm f/4 GM OSS—represent the pinnacle of optical engineering for sports, wildlife, and action photography. Both deliver razor-sharp detail, blazing-fast autofocus, and professional-grade durability, but they cater to slightly different shooting scenarios. Here’s how they compare.
Key Features at a Glance
1. Sony FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS – The Low-Light Champion
-
Aperture:Â f/2.8 (1.5 stops brighter than f/4)
-
Best For:Â Night sports, wildlife in dim light, indoor events
-
Why Choose It?
-
Unmatched low-light performance for freezing fast action
-
More versatile with teleconverters (560mm f/4 w/ 1.4x TC, 800mm f/5.6 w/ 2x TC)
-
Slightly lighter (2,895g) and better balanced for handheld shooting
-
Closer minimum focus (2.7m) for tighter framing on large subjects
-
2. Sony FE 600mm f/4 GM OSS – The Reach Master
-
Aperture:Â f/4 (still bright, but sacrifices some light for reach)
-
Best For:Â Bird photography, safari, distant wildlife
-
Why Choose It?
-
Unrivaled magnification for small or faraway subjects
-
With 1.4x TC: 840mm f/5.6 | With 2x TC: 1200mm f/8 (extreme reach)
-
Petal-shaped hood reduces flare better than the 400mm’s cylindrical hood
-
Slightly longer but only ~150g heavier than the 400mm
-
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS | 600mm f/4 GM OSS |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/2.8Â (Better in low light) | f/4 (More depth of field) |
| Teleconverter Use | More flexible (560mm f/4, 800mm f/5.6) | Longer reach (840mm f/5.6, 1200mm f/8) |
| Weight | 2,895g (6.38 lbs) | 3,040g (6.70 lbs) |
| Minimum Focus | 2.7m (Better for large wildlife) | 4.5m (Requires more distance) |
| Best Use Case | Sports, low-light wildlife | Birds, distant wildlife |
| Price | ~$12,000 | ~$13,000 |
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the 400mm f/2.8 GM if you:
✔ Shoot in low light (stadiums, dusk wildlife)
✔ Need versatility with teleconverters
✔ Prefer a slightly lighter setup for handheld shooting
Choose the 600mm f/4 GM if you:
✔ Specialize in birding or safari photography
✔ Require maximum reach without sacrificing too much light
✔ Want the best possible compression for distant subjects
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.