Wholesale AMD EPYC 7453 EPYC 74F3 28C/56T 2.75GHz Processor 3.45GHz Boost Clock Socket SP3 225W TDP 64MB L3 Cache Desktop Refurbished
Here’s a detailed comparison table for AMD EPYC 7453 and EPYC 74F3 processors:
Specification | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 74F3 |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Zen 3 (Milan) | Zen 3 (Milan) |
Cores/Threads | 28/56 | 24/48 |
Base Clock (GHz) | 2.75 | 3.2 |
Max Boost Clock (GHz) | 3.45 | 4.0 |
L3 Cache (MB) | 64 (16MB per CCD) | 256 (32MB per CCX) |
TDP (Watts) | 225W | 240W |
PCIe 4.0 Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Memory Support | 8-channel DDR4-3200 | 8-channel DDR4-3200 |
Memory Capacity | Up to 4TB | Up to 4TB |
Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
Multi-socket Support | Yes (2P) | Yes (2P) |
Launch Year | 2021 | 2021 |
Target Market | High core count workloads | High frequency & cache workloads |
AMD EPYC 7453 vs EPYC 74F3: Specialized Server Processors Compared
1. AMD EPYC 7453 – High-Core Density Workhorse
Target Use Case:Â Parallel processing and throughput-oriented workloads
Key Features:
-
28 cores/56 threads (Zen 3 architecture)
-
2.75GHz base / 3.45GHz boost clock speeds
-
64MB L3 cache (standard Zen 3 configuration)
-
225W TDPÂ with optimized power efficiency
-
8-channel DDR4-3200Â memory support
-
128 PCIe 4.0 lanes for expansive I/O
Performance Advantages:
-
17% more cores than 74F3 (28 vs 24)
-
Superior core density for virtualization (higher VM capacity)
-
Excellent thermal design for sustained all-core workloads
Best For:Â Cloud service providers, video rendering farms, scientific computing, and enterprise virtualization where maximum core count matters more than peak single-thread performance.
2. AMD EPYC 74F3 – Extreme Cache Performance
Target Use Case:Â Latency-sensitive and cache-dependent applications
Key Features:
-
24 cores/48 threads (Zen 3 with 3D V-Cache)
-
3.2GHz base / 4.0GHz boost (significantly higher clocks)
-
256MB L3 cache (4x standard amount)
-
240W TDPÂ for maximum performance headroom
-
Same memory/PCIe support as 7453
Performance Advantages:
-
Delivers 50% more cache bandwidth than standard Zen 3
-
15-20% better gaming server performance
-
25% faster database queries in benchmark tests
Best For:Â Financial trading systems, real-time analytics, MMO game servers, and high-performance databases where low latency and cache performance are critical.
Technical Comparison Deep Dive
Cache Architecture Differences:
-
7453:Â Traditional 64MB L3 cache (16MB per CCD)
-
74F3:Â Stacked 3D V-Cache design with 256MB total (additional 64MB per CCX)
Clock Speed Tradeoffs:
Metric | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 74F3 | Advantage |
---|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2.75GHz | 3.2GHz | 74F3 +16% |
Boost Clock | 3.45GHz | 4.0GHz | 74F3 +16% |
All-Core Turbo | ~3.1GHz | ~3.5GHz | 74F3 +13% |
Real-World Performance:
-
Database Workloads:Â 74F3 outperforms by 18-25%
-
Virtual Machines:Â 7453 supports 12% more VMs
-
Render Times:Â 7453 finishes 15% faster in Blender
-
Latency-Sensitive Apps:Â 74F3 responds 30% faster
Purchase Recommendations
Choose EPYC 7453 when:
-
Running heavily parallelized applications
-
Maximizing VM density is the priority
-
Your workload scales linearly with core count
-
Power efficiency per core matters
Choose EPYC 74F3 when:
-
Application performance is cache-bound
-
Low-latency response is critical
-
Running in-memory databases
-
Single-thread performance matters
Pricing Note:Â The 74F3 carries a 25-30% price premium over the 7453 due to its specialized cache technology, but delivers exceptional value for the right workloads.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.