100% Original Wholesale used/refurnished grade A level trayed packed AMD PRO A6-8570 PRO A6-8570E cpus
Here’s a detailed comparison table for the AMD PRO A6-8570 and PRO A6-8570E, along with their key specifications and differences:
AMD PRO A6-8570 vs. PRO A6-8570E – Comparison Table
| Feature | AMD PRO A6-8570 | AMD PRO A6-8570E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Excavator (2nd-gen) | Excavator (2nd-gen) | Same |
| Cores/Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 | Same |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz | 8570 has higher base clock |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz | 8570 has higher boost clock |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Same |
| L3 Cache | None | None | Same |
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 65W | 35W | 8570E is more power-efficient |
| GPU (Integrated Graphics) | Radeon R5 (4 CUs) | Radeon R5 (4 CUs) | Same |
| GPU Clock Speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | Same |
| Memory Support | DDR3-2133 | DDR3-2133 | Same |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 | Same |
| Socket | FM2+ | FM2+ | Same |
| Release Year | 2016 | 2016 | Same |
| Target Market | Business/Enterprise | Business/Enterprise (Low-Power) | 8570E for energy |
1. AMD PRO A6-8570
-
Architecture:Â Excavator (2nd-gen, 28nm)
-
Cores/Threads:Â 2 cores / 2 threads (no SMT)
-
Clock Speeds:Â 3.5 GHz base / 3.8 GHz boost
-
GPU:Â Radeon R5 (4 Compute Units, 800 MHz)
-
Cache:Â 1MB L2 (No L3 cache)
-
TDP:Â 65W
-
Memory Support:Â DDR3-2133 (FM2+ socket)
-
PCIe:Â PCIe 3.0
-
Release Year:Â 2016
-
Target Market:Â Business/Enterprise desktops
Description:
The AMD PRO A6-8570 is a budget dual-core APU designed for business and enterprise environments. Based on the older Excavator architecture, it offers modest performance for basic office tasks, web browsing, and multimedia playback. The Radeon R5 GPU (4 CUs) provides basic graphics acceleration but struggles with modern gaming or GPU-heavy workloads.
Key Features:
-
Higher clock speeds (3.5 GHz base / 3.8 GHz boost) than the 8570E.
-
65W TDPÂ means it requires more power but offers slightly better performance.
-
No L3 cache, limiting multitasking efficiency.
-
FM2+ socket (no upgrade path to newer platforms).
Best For:
-
Basic office PCs (Word, Excel, web browsing).
-
Legacy business systems needing DDR3 support.
-
Light-duty point-of-sale (POS) or kiosk machines.
2. AMD PRO A6-8570E
-
Architecture:Â Excavator (2nd-gen, 28nm)
-
Cores/Threads:Â 2 cores / 2 threads (no SMT)
-
Clock Speeds:Â 3.1 GHz base / 3.5 GHz boost
-
GPU:Â Radeon R5 (4 Compute Units, 800 MHz)
-
Cache:Â 1MB L2 (No L3 cache)
-
TDP:Â 35W
-
Memory Support:Â DDR3-2133 (FM2+ socket)
-
PCIe:Â PCIe 3.0
-
Release Year:Â 2016
-
Target Market:Â Energy-efficient business PCs
Description:
The AMD PRO A6-8570E is a low-power variant of the PRO A6-8570, designed for energy-efficient business desktops. It has lower clock speeds (3.1 GHz base / 3.5 GHz boost) but a much lower 35W TDP, making it ideal for small-form-factor PCs or systems where power efficiency is a priority.
Key Features:
-
35W TDPÂ (better for passive/quiet cooling solutions).
-
Same Radeon R5 GPU as the 8570, but slightly slower CPU performance.
-
FM2+ socket (limited upgrade options).
-
No SMT or L3 cache, restricting multitasking performance.
Best For:
-
Low-power office PCs.
-
Compact or fanless business systems.
-
Digital signage or thin clients.
Comparison Summary
| Aspect | PRO A6-8570 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | Slightly faster (3.5/3.8 GHz) | Slower (3.1/3.5 GHz) |
| Power Efficiency | 65W TDP | 35W TDP (More efficient) |
| Use Case | General office use | Low-power/compact systems |
| Graphics | Same Radeon R5 (4 CUs) | Same Radeon R5 (4 CUs) |
| Upgrade Path | FM2+ (obsolete) | FM2+ (obsolete) |
Final Verdict:
-
Choose the PRO A6-8570Â if you need slightly better CPU performance in a standard office PC.
-
Choose the PRO A6-8570EÂ if power efficiency is critical (e.g., small form factor, fanless builds).
Both chips are outdated by modern standards and lack features like SMT, L3 cache, and DDR4 support. For better performance, consider AMD Athlon 3000G (Zen) or Ryzen 3 PRO processors on the AM4 platform.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.