For AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary Ryzen 7 3700X 3800X Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 3.7 GHz Eight-Core Sixteen-Thread 16M 105W CPU Processor Socket AM4
Here’s a detailed comparison table for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary Edition, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 7 3800X, and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700:
Specification | Ryzen 7 2700X (50th AE) | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 3800X | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Zen+ (12nm) | Zen 2 (7nm) | Zen 2 (7nm) | Zen 2 (7nm) |
Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost Clock | 4.35 GHz | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | 4 MB | 4 MB |
L3 Cache | 16 MB | 32 MB | 32 MB | 32 MB |
TDP | 105W | 65W | 105W | 65W |
PCIe Version | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Unlocked (OC) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No (Locked) |
Cooler Included | Wraith Prism (RGB) | Wraith Prism | None (OEM) | Wraith Spire |
Memory Support | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
Launch Price (USD) | ~$329 (Limited Edition) | ~$329 | ~$399 | OEM Only |
Key Features | Gold-colored IHS, Collector’s Item | Best Value 8-core Zen 2 | Higher clocks, 105W TDP |
1. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary Edition
-
Architecture:Â Zen+ (12nm)
-
Cores/Threads:Â 8/16
-
Clocks:Â 3.7GHz base / 4.35GHz boost
-
Cache:Â 16MB L3
-
TDP:Â 105W
-
Special Features:Â Gold-colored IHS, collector’s packaging, Wraith Prism RGB cooler
This limited-edition CPU was released for AMD’s 50th anniversary, featuring a premium gold finish but identical specifications to the standard 2700X. While it offers solid 8-core performance, it’s based on the older Zen+ architecture, making it less efficient than newer Zen 2 chips. Today, it’s primarily a collector’s item rather than a performance leader.
2. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
-
Architecture:Â Zen 2 (7nm)
-
Cores/Threads:Â 8/16
-
Clocks:Â 3.6GHz base / 4.4GHz boost
-
Cache:Â 32MB L3
-
TDP:Â 65W
-
Key Advantage:Â Best price-to-performance ratio
The 3700X was the sweet spot in AMD’s Zen 2 lineup, offering 19% better IPC than the 2700X while running much cooler (65W TDP). Its inclusion of PCIe 4.0 support and the capable Wraith Prism cooler made it perfect for both gaming and productivity workloads. Even today, it remains a great budget 8-core option.
3. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
-
Architecture:Â Zen 2 (7nm)
-
Cores/Threads:Â 8/16
-
Clocks:Â 3.9GHz base / 4.5GHz boost
-
Cache:Â 32MB L3
-
TDP:Â 105W
-
Key Difference:Â Higher clocks, no included cooler
The 3800X was essentially a binned 3700X with slightly higher clocks (100-200MHz) at the cost of significantly higher power draw. In real-world use, the performance difference was minimal (2-5%), making the 3700X the better value. The 3800X didn’t include a stock cooler, requiring aftermarket cooling solutions.
4. AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
-
Architecture:Â Zen 2 (7nm)
-
Cores/Threads:Â 8/16
-
Clocks:Â 3.6GHz base / 4.4GHz boost
-
Cache:Â 32MB L3
-
TDP:Â 65W
-
PRO Features:Â ECC support, longer warranty, locked multiplier
This business-oriented variant matched the 3700X in specifications but added ECC memory support and enterprise-grade reliability features. Unlike consumer models, it had a locked multiplier but included a Wraith Spire cooler. It was only available through OEM/system integrators.
Performance Comparison
-
Single-Core: 3800X ≈ 3700X > PRO 3700 > 2700X
-
Multi-Core: 3800X ≈ 3700X ≈ PRO 3700 > 2700X
-
Efficiency:Â 3700X/PRO 3700 (65W) > 3800X (105W) > 2700X (105W)
-
Gaming:Â Zen 2 models (3700X/3800X) are 15-20% faster than 2700X
Which One Should You Choose?
-
Collectors/Enthusiasts:Â 2700X 50th Anniversary
-
Best Value Users:Â 3700X (still excellent for gaming/productivity)
-
Maximum Performance:Â 3800X (minor gains over 3700X)
-
Business/Workstation:Â PRO 3700 (for ECC memory support)
The 3700X remains the standout choice for most users, offering nearly identical performance to the 3800X at lower power consumption. The 2700X is now primarily interesting for collectors, while the PRO 3700 serves niche business needs. All Zen 2 models significantly outperform the 2700X in both gaming and productivity workloads.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.