Whoelsea AMD EPYC 7413 7443 7443P 2.65GHz 24 Cores 48 Threads TDP 180W SP3 Processor for Server CPU

AMD EPYC 7413 vs 7443 vs 7443P: Processor Comparison Guide

1. AMD EPYC 7413 (Zen 2 “Rome”)

Target Use Case: Cost-effective virtualization and general server workloads
Key Features:

• 24 cores/48 threads (Zen 2 architecture)

• 2.65GHz base / 3.6GHz boost clock speeds

• 128MB L3 cache

• 180W TDP (most power-efficient of the three)

• Supports dual-socket configurations (2P)

• 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes and 8-channel DDR4-3200 memory

Strengths:

• Most affordable 24-core EPYC option

• Proven Zen 2 reliability

• Excellent for virtualized environments and containerized workloads

Best For: Businesses with existing Zen 2 infrastructure looking for economical 24-core performance in virtualization, cloud hosting, and general enterprise workloads.

2. AMD EPYC 7443 (Zen 3 “Milan”)

Target Use Case: High-performance enterprise and cloud workloads
Key Features:

• 24 cores/48 threads (Zen 3 architecture)

• 2.85GHz base / 3.7GHz boost (200MHz faster than 7413)

• 128MB L3 cache (improved efficiency over Zen 2)

• 200W TDP

• Supports dual-socket configurations (2P)

• 19% better IPC than Zen 2

Strengths:

• Significant performance uplift over 7413

• Better performance-per-watt

• Ideal for mixed workload environments

Best For: Modern data centers needing balanced performance for databases, ERP systems, and private cloud deployments where both core count and single-thread performance matter.

3. AMD EPYC 7443P (Zen 3 “Milan”)

Target Use Case: Single-socket optimized solutions
Key Features:

• Same 24 cores/48 threads and 128MB L3 cache as 7443

• Identical 2.85GHz base / 3.7GHz boost clocks

• 200W TDP

• Single-socket only (cost-optimized)

• Same Zen 3 advantages as 7443

Strengths:

• More affordable than 7443 (no dual-socket premium)

• Full Zen 3 performance in single-socket form factor

• Better value than 7413 for new deployments