100% Original Wholesale Large Number of Server Processors EPYC 7H12 EPYC 7F72 EPYC 7F52 EPYC 7H12 AMD

100% Original Wholesale Large Number of Server Processors EPYC 7H12 EPYC 7F72 EPYC 7F52 EPYC 7H12 AMD

Here’s a detailed comparison table for the AMD EPYC processors you mentioned:

. AMD EPYC 7H12 – The High-Core Count Powerhouse

• Best for: High-performance computing (HPC), virtualization, cloud servers, and data center workloads.
• Key Features:
  • 64 cores / 128 threads – The highest core count in this lineup, ideal for massively parallel workloads.
  • 2.6 GHz base / 3.3 GHz boost – Optimized for multi-threaded efficiency rather than raw clock speeds.
  • 256MB L3 cache – Massive cache to accelerate data-heavy applications.
  • 280W TDP – High power consumption due to extreme core density.
• Use Cases: Scientific computing, rendering farms, large-scale databases, and enterprise virtualization.

2. AMD EPYC 7F72 – The High-Frequency Workhorse

• Best for: Enterprise applications, databases, and workloads needing strong per-core performance.
• Key Features:
  • 24 cores / 48 threads – Balanced between core count and clock speeds.
  • 3.2 GHz base / 3.7 GHz boost – Higher frequency than 7H12, better for latency-sensitive tasks.
  • 192MB L3 cache – Still substantial for enterprise workloads.
  • 240W TDP – More power-efficient than the 7H12.
• Use Cases: Financial modeling, ERP systems, high-frequency trading, and virtualization with moderate core needs.

3. AMD EPYC 7F52 – The Balanced Performer

• Best for: General enterprise workloads, cloud services, and applications needing strong single-thread performance.
• Key Features:
  • 16 cores / 32 threads – Fewer cores but higher clock speeds.
  • 3.5 GHz base / 3.9 GHz boost – Best single-thread performance in this group.
  • 128MB L3 cache – Efficient for most business applications.
  • 240W TDP – Matches the 7F72 in power efficiency.
• Use Cases: Web servers, mid-range databases, software development, and enterprise applications requiring fast response times.

Summary of Best Use Cases: