Skip to content

Original AMD EPYC 7343 EPYC 73F3 16 Cores 32 Threads 190W 3.2GHz Server/workstation Processor

$674.47$1,475.40

  1. Clock Speeds & Performance:

    • 73F3 has higher base (3.5GHz vs 3.2GHz) and boost clocks (4.0GHz vs 3.9GHz), making it better for latency-sensitive workloads.

    • 7343 is more power-efficient (190W vs 240W) but sacrifices peak performance.

  2. Cache Size:

    • 73F3 has double the L3 cache (256MB vs 128MB), significantly improving performance in cache-sensitive applications (e.g., databases, HPC).

  3. TDP & Power Efficiency:

    • 73F3 has a 240W TDP (higher power draw for maximum performance).

    • 7343 runs at 190W, making it more efficient for general workloads.

  4. Use Cases:

    • EPYC 73F3: Best for high-performance computing (HPC), financial modeling, gaming servers, and databases where cache and clock speeds matter most.

    • EPYC 7343: Ideal for virtualization, cloud workloads, and enterprise applications needing a balance of power and efficiency.

Which One to Choose?

  • Need maximum single-thread performance and cache? → EPYC 73F3

  • Prefer better power efficiency for general server workloads? → EPYC 7343

SKU: N/A Category:

Original AMD EPYC 7343 EPYC 73F3 16 Cores 32 Threads 190W 3.2GHz Server/workstation Processor

Here’s a detailed comparison table for AMD EPYC 7343 and EPYC 73F3 processors:

Specification EPYC 7343 EPYC 73F3
Architecture Zen 3 (Milan) Zen 3 (Milan)
Cores / Threads 16 / 32 16 / 32
Base Clock (GHz) 3.2 3.5
Max Boost Clock (GHz) 3.9 4.0
L3 Cache (MB) 128 256 (32MB per CCX)
TDP (Watts) 190W 240W
PCIe 4.0 Lanes 128 128
Memory Support 8-channel DDR4-3200 8-channel DDR4-3200
Memory Capacity Up to 4TB Up to 4TB
Socket SP3 SP3
Launch Year 2021 2021
Target Market General-purpose servers High-frequency workloads

AMD EPYC 7343 vs EPYC 73F3 – Detailed Comparison

1. AMD EPYC 7343 – Balanced Performance & Efficiency

  • Target Use Case: General-purpose enterprise workloads, virtualization, cloud computing, and data center applications.

  • Key Features:

    • 16 cores / 32 threads (Zen 3 architecture)

    • 3.2 GHz base / 3.9 GHz boost clock speeds

    • 128MB L3 cache (8MB per core)

    • 190W TDP – optimized for power efficiency

    • Supports 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes and 8-channel DDR4-3200 memory

    • Dual-socket capable (2P configurations)

  • Strengths:

    • Excellent balance between core count, clock speeds, and power efficiency

    • Ideal for virtualized environments and multi-tenant cloud deployments

    • More cost-effective than 73F3 for general server workloads

  • Best For: Enterprise applications, private cloud infrastructure, and virtualization where consistent performance and efficiency are prioritized over peak single-thread speed.

2. AMD EPYC 73F3 – High-Frequency, High-Cache Performance

  • Target Use Case: Latency-sensitive and cache-dependent workloads requiring maximum single-thread performance.

  • Key Features:

    • 16 cores / 32 threads (Zen 3 architecture)

    • 3.5 GHz base / 4.0 GHz boost – higher clocks than 7343

    • 256MB L3 cache (16MB per core) – double the 7343’s cache

    • 240W TDP – higher power draw for maximum performance

    • Same 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes and memory support as 7343

    • Dual-socket capable

  • Strengths:

    • Superior single-thread performance for database workloads

    • Massive L3 cache benefits in-memory applications and HPC

    • Higher sustained boost clocks for demanding workloads

  • Best For: Financial modeling, real-time analytics, high-frequency trading, gaming servers, and scientific computing where cache size and clock speeds are critical.

Key Differences Summary:

Aspect EPYC 7343 EPYC 73F3
Clock Speeds 3.2/3.9 GHz 3.5/4.0 GHz
L3 Cache 128MB 256MB
TDP 190W 240W
Performance Balanced multi-thread Optimized single-thread
Use Case General servers High-performance workloads

Which Processor Should You Choose?

  • Choose EPYC 7343 if: You need a versatile, power-efficient processor for general enterprise workloads, virtualization, or cloud deployments where absolute peak performance isn’t required.

  • Choose EPYC 73F3 if: You’re running cache-sensitive or latency-critical applications like financial modeling, real-time databases, or scientific computing where every bit of single-thread performance matters.

EPYC 7343

EPYC 7343, EPYC 73F3

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Original AMD EPYC 7343 EPYC 73F3 16 Cores 32 Threads 190W 3.2GHz Server/workstation Processor”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *